Ryan Peniston vs James McCabe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 May at 03:11 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Peniston vs J. McCabe

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Peniston 1 - 0 McCabe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryan Peniston winning 2 and James McCabe winning 0. The last match between Ryan Peniston and James McCabe was at the Wuxi Challenger, 05-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Peniston getting the victory 6-2 3-2 ret..
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Peniston | 1 |
McCabe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Wuxi Challenger(05-05-25)
R. Peniston vs J. McCabe H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$263,350 | Career Prize Money | $358,055 |
61.67% (362-225) | Career Total W/L | 56.75% (164-125) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
10 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
R. Peniston vs J. McCabe Match Preview:
As we delve into the intricacies of this anticipated tennis clash, we've compiled stats that paint a vivid picture—who is likely to dominate the court? Let us start with second serve performance. In the last six months, who's been more reliable here? McCabe edges out, securing 44.28% of points on second serve, while Peniston is not far behind at 42.2%. A higher percentage here often correlates with match prediction accuracy.
But how about when it comes to returning serves? The numbers speak volumes when you unpack recent performance in return games. McCabe triumphs again, claiming victory in 47.45% of opponent's second serve points, surpassing Peniston's 43.86%. It’s a tight race when we're talking first serve returns though, McCabe with 23.67% while Peniston takes a lead at 28.76%. Such distinctions can illuminate who might emerge favored in this head-to-head encounter.
Now, under pressure, how do these players stand their ground? McCabe has demonstrated resilience, saving 57.19% of breakpoints compared to Peniston’s 50.6%. This can be a valuable statistic for those placing in-game bets. Moreover, if this match inches towards a deciding set, Peniston’s advantage shines through with a 54% win rate over the past year, dramatically overshadowing McCabe's as-yet-undemonstrated prowess in such situations.
Looking at their win/loss records over the last 12 months provides a stark contrast. McCabe has yet to taste victory in match play (W/L 0/0), whereas Peniston brings a commendable 64.86% match win rate (W/L 48/26). Furthermore, Peniston has faced players with an average ranking of 397.45, providing a glimpse into the level of competition he's been competing against.
Victory in tennis not only depends on skill but on seizing breakpoint opportunities as well. Recent stats show McCabe converting 32.98% and Peniston slightly better at 35.78% of these vital chances. Such figures can greatly influence the match outcomes and are crucial for live betting strategies.
In a sport that demands precision and mental fortitude, these statistics lean towards predicting that Peniston might hold the upper hand in this matchup. With his proven track record, consistent breakpoint conversions, and stamina in deciding sets, Peniston seems to be in a favorable position to claim victory in this contest.
Ryan Peniston vs James McCabe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Peniston vs J. McCabe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
9 | Games Won | 4 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:8:1 | Average Match Time | 1:8:1 |
57% (20/35) | 1st Serve % | 50% (27/54) |
80% (16/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (17/27) |
80% (12/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
50% (27/54) | Return Points Win % | 20% (7/35) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Peniston Recent Matches Played
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played

R. Peniston vs J. McCabe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.67% (362/225) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.75% (164/125) |
59.59% (792/537) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.76% (368/304) |
54.56% (6658/5545) | Games Win/Loss | 51.69% (3338/3120) |
66.98% (217/107) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (135/90) |
57.53% (42/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.00% (12/18) |
55.83% (67/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
51.43% (36/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.57% (15/13) |
0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.63 |
1129 | Aces Total | 1987 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1291 | Total Double Faults | 644 |
1:23:36 | Average Match Time | 1:43:42 |
425.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.84 |
62% (19400/31247) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11757/19562) |
68% (13108/19400) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (8515/11757) |
51% (6010/11847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3835/7805) |
43% (1621/3740) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (696/1721) |
43% (13767/32326) | Return Points Win % | 37% (7259/19397) |
25.00% (4/12) | Slam W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
41.18% (7/10) | Main Tour W/L | 31.58% (6/13) |
54.26% (121/102) | Challenger W/L | 51.97% (79/73) |
69.70% (230/100) | Futures W/L | 70.87% (73/30) |
62% (355/575) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (157/276) |
50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
52% (66/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (66/126) |
55% (88/159) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (51/90) |
88% (358/316) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (155/135) |
12% (358/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (155/20) |
21% (229/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (134/29) |